http://www.novaspivack.com/technology/jim-hendler-on-the-chaotic-semantic-web?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=jim-hendler-on-the-chaotic-semantic-web The Future of the Web, Search Technology, and the Global Brain Fri, 23 Dec 2011 09:45:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.novaspivack.com/technology/jim-hendler-on-the-chaotic-semantic-web/comment-page-1#comment-4526 Rachel Sat, 24 Nov 2007 18:31:39 +0000 http://www.novaspivack.com/?p=94#comment-4526 Actually, I think your original title was correct. The part I question is the idea that Hendler is refutting criticisms of the semantic web. While that’s partially true (especially in the case of Shirky & O’Reilly, it seems), his post is mostly about adamantly denouncing things that I said that he actually agrees with. Actually, I think your original title was correct. The part I question is the idea that Hendler is refutting criticisms of the semantic web. While that’s partially true (especially in the case of Shirky & O’Reilly, it seems), his post is mostly about adamantly denouncing things that I said that he actually agrees with.

]]> http://www.novaspivack.com/technology/jim-hendler-on-the-chaotic-semantic-web/comment-page-1#comment-4525 Rachel Sat, 24 Nov 2007 09:55:37 +0000 http://www.novaspivack.com/?p=94#comment-4525 Hi Nova, I'd like to point out that "Chaotic Semantic Web" is actually a phrase that I coined - in the post that Jim is evidently refuting. The fact that you've conflated our two points of view only underscores my position that Jim and I are actually in violent agreement! Hi Nova,
I’d like to point out that “Chaotic Semantic Web” is actually a phrase that I coined – in the post that Jim is evidently refuting. The fact that you’ve conflated our two points of view only underscores my position that Jim and I are actually in violent agreement!

]]>