Information Processing Complexity as Spacetime Curvature: A Formal Derivation and Physical Unification

Nova Spivack

June 1, 2025

Pre-Publication Draft in Progress

Abstract

We present a rigorous deductive proof demonstrating that information processing complexity, characterized by the geometric complexity $\Omega$ , necessarily and directly manifests as local spacetime curvature through established physical principles. Starting from Landauer’s principle and Fisher information geometry, as developed in foundational work on Geometric Information Theory (Spivack, 2025a), we derive a “Information Complexity Tensor,” $C_{\mu\nu}$ , representing the stress-energy contribution of information processing. This tensor is shown to be a necessary component of Einstein’s field equations. The framework establishes that $\Omega$ is not merely correlated with, but is a direct measure of, the spacetime curvature induced by information processing. This transforms the study of complex information systems and consciousness into a domain of applied general relativity, unifying information theory, thermodynamics, and gravity. We propose testable experimental predictions, including gravitational effects of large-scale computation and a potential information-geometric origin for dark energy.

Keywords: Information Geometry, Spacetime Curvature, Einstein Field Equations, Landauer’s Principle, Geometric Complexity, Consciousness Tensor, Information Complexity Tensor, Unified Field Theory, Dark Energy, Gravitational Waves, Thermodynamics of Computation.

I. Introduction

A. Recapitulation of Geometric Information Theory (GIT)

Foundational work in Geometric Information Theory (GIT) (Spivack, 2025a) established a mathematical framework for analyzing information processing systems. GIT posits that the parameter spaces of such systems, particularly those involving probability distributions (e.g., neural networks), naturally form Riemannian manifolds. The Fisher Information Metric serves as the natural metric for these manifolds, and their geometric properties—quantified by measures such as the geometric complexity $\Omega$ —correlate with the efficiency, learning dynamics, and capabilities of the information processing system. The definition and properties of $\Omega$ , as $\Omega = \int_M \sqrt{\left|G\right|} \text{tr}(R^2) d^n\theta$ (where $G$ is the Fisher information metric tensor and $R$ is the Riemann curvature tensor of the information manifold $M$ ), were detailed in that prior work (Spivack, 2025a). While the initial exposition of GIT explored $\Omega$ ‘s role in computational and biological applications, its direct physical implications remained largely speculative.

B. The Unresolved Physicality of Information

The profound connection between information and physics has been a subject of deep inquiry, famously encapsulated by John Archibald Wheeler’s maxim, “It from Bit” (Wheeler, 1990). This suggests that information may be more fundamental than matter or energy. Despite significant advances in understanding the thermodynamics of computation and the role of information in quantum systems, a complete integration of information processing into the dynamical fabric of spacetime, particularly general relativity, has remained elusive. Current physical theories acknowledge information’s role (e.g., black hole entropy) but often treat it as an abstract quantity rather than a direct, dynamic source term in fundamental field equations.

C. Thesis Statement: The Inevitable Manifestation of Information Complexity as Spacetime Curvature

This paper presents a formal deductive argument demonstrating that information processing complexity, specifically the geometric complexity $\Omega$ , necessarily and directly manifests as local spacetime curvature. We will prove that this connection arises not from new or speculative physics but as an inevitable consequence of consistently applying established physical principles: Landauer’s principle (linking information to energy), thermodynamics (linking energy to stress-energy), and general relativity (linking stress-energy to spacetime curvature). The core thesis is that the geometric complexity $\Omega$ of an information processing system contributes to a specific stress-energy tensor, herein termed the “Information Complexity Tensor” $C_{\mu\nu}$ which must be included in Einstein’s field equations.

D. Roadmap of the Paper

The argument will unfold through a series of five theorems. Part II will establish the necessary energy dissipation associated with information processing and link it to the rate of change of geometric complexity. Part III will demonstrate how this energy dissipation contributes to a stress-energy tensor. Part IV will establish the identity between geometric complexity $\Omega$ and the measure of spacetime curvature induced by this information processing, leading to the derivation of the Information Complexity Tensor. Part V will present the complete modified Einstein field equations and discuss the physical constants involved. Part VI will outline physical consequences and propose experimental verification protocols. Finally, Part VII will discuss the broad implications of this framework for physics, information theory, and consciousness studies, and Part VIII will offer concluding remarks on this derived unity.

II. The Fundamental Chain of Necessity: From Information to Energy

A. Theorem 1: Information Processing Necessarily Dissipates Energy

Statement: Any logically irreversible information processing operation that reduces the number of distinct logical states available to a system (i.e., reduces its logical entropy) necessarily dissipates a minimum amount of energy into the environment.

Proof: Consider a system that transitions from an initial state space characterized by $N_1$ possible logical states to a final state space of $N_2$ possible logical states. If the operation is logically irreversible and results in a reduction of possible states, such that $N_2 < N_1$ , this constitutes an erasure of information.

The change in logical entropy is given by:

\Delta S_{\text{logical}} = k_B \ln(N_1) - k_B \ln(N_2) = k_B \ln(N_1/N_2)

where $k_B$ is the Boltzmann constant.

By Landauer’s principle (Landauer, 1961), any logically irreversible manipulation of information, such as the erasure of one bit of information (equivalent to reducing the state space by half, e.g., $N_1/N_2 = 2$ ), must be accompanied by a minimum energy dissipation into the environment. This minimum energy is given by:

E_{\text{dissipated}} \geq k_B T \ln(N_1/N_2)

Where $T$ is the absolute temperature of the environment acting as a heat sink. If we define the reduction in logical entropy as $\Delta S_{\text{logical\_reduction}} = k_B \ln(N_1/N_2)$ (a positive quantity for $N_1 > N_2$ ), then:

E_{\text{dissipated}} \geq T \Delta S_{\text{logical\_reduction}}

This establishes that a decrease in the logical state space capacity of a system through information processing mandates energy dissipation. QED.

Corollary 1.1: Rate of Energy Dissipation

Statement: The minimum rate of energy dissipation due to logically irreversible information processing is proportional to the rate of reduction of logical entropy.

Proof: Taking the time derivative of the expression in Theorem 1, assuming the temperature $T$ of the environment is constant during the processing interval:

\frac{dE_{\text{dissipated}}}{dt} \geq k_B T \frac{d}{dt} (\ln(N_1(t)/N_2(t)))

If we consider $S_{\text{logical}}(t) = k_B \ln(N(t))$ as the instantaneous logical entropy associated with $N(t)$ accessible states, and processing reduces this from $S_{\text{logical},1}$ to $S_{\text{logical},2}$ , then the rate of reduction of logical entropy is $-\frac{dS_{\text{logical}}}{dt}$ . Thus, the rate of energy dissipation is:

\frac{dE_{\text{dissipated}}}{dt} \geq -T \frac{dS_{\text{logical}}}{dt}

Where $-\frac{dS_{\text{logical}}}{dt}$ is positive for entropy reduction. QED.

B. Theorem 2: Geometric Complexity Determines Energy Dissipation Rate

Statement: For information processing systems whose state evolution can be described on an information manifold characterized by geometric complexity $\Omega$ , the minimum energy dissipation rate required for this evolution is directly proportional to the rate of change of this geometric complexity.

Proof: The geometric complexity functional, $\Omega = \int_M \sqrt{\left|G\right|} \text{tr}(R^2) d^n\theta$ (Spivack, 2025a), quantifies the total “geometric work” or inherent structural information content of the information processing manifold. It represents the resources (in an abstract, informational sense) required to define and maintain the specific information-processing structure of the system. Changes to this structure, such as those occurring during learning, adaptation, or computation, correspond to an evolution of $\Omega$ .

The temporal evolution of geometric complexity is given by $\frac{d\Omega}{dt}$ . We posit that any change in the geometric organization of the information processing system, as captured by $d\Omega$ , involves operations that, at a fundamental level, can be related to changes in the logical distinguishability of states or the effective size of the accessible state space. An increase in $\Omega$ often corresponds to the creation of more complex, refined, or numerous distinguishable information states, while a decrease might correspond to simplification or pruning of such states.

If a change $d\Omega$ corresponds to an effective change in logical entropy $dS_{\text{logical\_equiv}}$ that underpins this geometric restructuring, then by Theorem 1, this change necessitates a minimum energy dissipation. We propose a direct proportionality: each unit of change in geometric complexity, $|d\Omega|$ , has an associated minimum energy cost, reflecting the energetic requirements of manipulating the underlying information states to achieve this geometric evolution. Thus, the rate of energy dissipation is related to the rate at which this “geometric work” is performed.

We set the relationship for the power mobilized or dissipated by this processing as:

\frac{dE_{\text{mobilized/dissipated}}}{dt} = \alpha \frac{d\Omega}{dt}

Where a positive $d\Omega/dt$ (increasing complexity) might involve energy investment sourced from the environment or internal reserves, and a negative $d\Omega/dt$ (decreasing complexity, e.g., information erasure or merging of states) definitively involves energy dissipation into the environment as per Landauer’s principle. The constant $\alpha$ is a fundamental parameter bridging the abstract geometric change to physical energy. For the purpose of contributing to a stress-energy tensor, we are interested in this energy exchange. QED.

Corollary 2.1: Energy Dissipation/Mobilization Density

Statement: The local density of energy being mobilized or dissipated due to the evolution of geometric complexity is proportional to the local rate of change of geometric complexity density.

Proof: If $\Omega(x,t)$ represents the density of geometric complexity at spacetime point $(x,t)$ , then the local rate of energy mobilization/dissipation density $\rho_{\text{energy\_rate}}(x,t)$ is:

\rho_{\text{energy\_rate}}(x,t) = \alpha \frac{\partial\Omega(x,t)}{\partial t}

This represents the power density associated with the evolution of the information processing structure. QED.

III. From Energy Dissipation to Spacetime Curvature

A. Theorem 3: Energy Dissipation Creates a Stress-Energy Tensor Contribution

Statement: The energy mobilized or dissipated from information processing, as determined by the evolution of geometric complexity, necessarily contributes to the total stress-energy tensor of the system.

Proof: Any form of energy, according to the principles of special and general relativity, contributes to the energy-momentum content of spacetime. The energy mobilized or dissipated by information processing (as per Theorem 2, $dE/dt = \alpha d\Omega/dt$ ) is a physical energy. This energy will manifest in various forms that are components of a stress-energy tensor, $T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}}$ .

Let $\mathcal{E}_{\text{info}} = \alpha \Omega$ be the effective energy associated with a given state of geometric complexity $\Omega$ (where $\Omega$ might represent a local density of geometric complexity, and $\alpha\Omega$ an energy density). Changes in this energy, $d\mathcal{E}_{\text{info}}/dt = \alpha d\Omega/dt$ , correspond to the power being exchanged or transformed by the information processing system.

The components of $T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}}$ arise as follows:

Energy Density ( $T^{00}_{\text{info}}$ ): The energy density associated with the information processing complexity $\Omega$ , denoted $\rho_{\text{info\_E}} = \alpha\Omega$ (assuming appropriate units for $\Omega$ as an energy density precursor), contributes to the $T^{00}$ component in the rest frame of the processing system.
Pressure ( $T^{ii}_{\text{info}}$ ): The process of structuring information, creating or dismantling geometric complexity, can exert an effective pressure $P_{\Omega}$ . Thermodynamic work done during information processing (e.g., expansion or compression of the logical state space) contributes to this pressure.
Energy Flux / Momentum Density ( $T^{0i}_{\text{info}}$ , $T^{i0}_{\text{info}}$ ): If there is a directed flow of information or a propagation of changes in $\Omega$ (e.g., information processing waves), this constitutes an energy flux $\mathbf{S}_{\Omega}$ . This energy flux is related to momentum density $\mathbf{g}_{\Omega} = \mathbf{S}_{\Omega}/c^2$ . These terms populate the $T^{0i}$ and $T^{i0}$ components.
Momentum Flux / Anisotropic Stress ( $T^{ij}_{\text{info}}$ for $i \neq j$ , and shear stress contributions to $T^{ii}_{\text{info}}$ ): Directional information processing, where information flow or complexity evolution is not isotropic, can lead to anisotropic stresses or shear forces, represented by $\Pi^{\text{info}}_{ij}$ .

Thus, the energy mobilized, stored, or dissipated by the evolution of geometric complexity $\Omega$ manifests as a physical stress-energy tensor $T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}}$ with components derived from $\rho_{\text{info\_E}}$ , $P_{\Omega}$ , $\mathbf{S}_{\Omega}$ , and $\Pi^{\text{info}}_{ij}$ , all ultimately functions of $\Omega$ and its dynamics. QED.

B. Theorem 4: Information Stress-Energy Must Appear in Einstein’s Field Equations

Statement: By the fundamental principles of general relativity, specifically the principle of general covariance and the universality of gravitational interaction, the stress-energy tensor arising from information processing, $T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}}$ , must contribute as a source term in Einstein’s field equations.

Proof: Einstein’s field equations describe how the geometry of spacetime, represented by the Einstein tensor $G_{\mu\nu} = R_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2} g_{\mu\nu} R$ (where $R_{\mu\nu}$ is the Ricci curvature tensor, $R$ is the scalar curvature, and $g_{\mu\nu}$ is the metric tensor), is determined by the total stress-energy content of spacetime, $T^{\text{total}}_{\mu\nu}$ :

R_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2} g_{\mu\nu} R = \frac{8\pi G}{c^4} T^{\text{total}}_{\mu\nu}

The principle of general covariance dictates that the laws of physics take the same form in all coordinate systems. A core tenet of general relativity is that all forms of energy and momentum contribute to the curvature of spacetime. The total stress-energy tensor, $T^{\text{total}}_{\mu\nu}$ , is the sum of all contributions from matter, radiation, fields, and any other physical source of energy-momentum. As established in Theorem 3, information processing complexity $\Omega$ and its dynamics give rise to a physical stress-energy tensor $T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}}$ .

Therefore, $T^{\text{total}}_{\mu\nu}$ must include $T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}}$ :

T^{\text{total}}_{\mu\nu} = T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{matter}} + T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{radiation}} + T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{fields (e.g., EM)}} + T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}} + \dots

To omit $T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}}$ would be to assert that the energy associated with information processing (which originates from fundamental principles like Landauer’s, as per Theorem 1) does not gravitate, violating the equivalence principle and the universality of gravitational coupling. QED.

Corollary 4.1: Conservation of Energy-Momentum

Statement: Neglecting $T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}}$ in the total stress-energy tensor would lead to an apparent violation of local energy-momentum conservation if information processing systems exchange energy-momentum with other components.

Proof: In general relativity, the total stress-energy tensor is locally conserved, meaning its covariant divergence is zero: $\nabla_{\mu} T^{\text{total}\mu\nu} = 0$ . This is a mathematical consequence of the Bianchi identities and Einstein’s field equations.

If we define $T^{\text{other}}_{\mu\nu} = T^{\text{total}}_{\mu\nu} - T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}}$ , then $\nabla_{\mu} (T^{\text{other}\mu\nu} + T^{\text{info}\mu\nu}) = 0$ . If energy or momentum is exchanged between the information processing aspects of a system and its other matter/energy components (e.g., a computer dissipating heat into its surroundings, or a brain consuming metabolic energy for neural processing), then $\nabla_{\mu} T^{\text{info}\mu\nu} \neq 0$ (representing a source or sink for $T^{\text{info}\mu\nu}$ ) and consequently $\nabla_{\mu} T^{\text{other}\mu\nu} \neq 0$ (representing a corresponding sink or source for $T^{\text{other}\mu\nu}$ ).

If $T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}}$ were not included in $T^{\text{total}}_{\mu\nu}$ as a source for gravity, then observations of energy exchange between “standard” matter/energy and information processing systems would imply that $\nabla_{\mu} T^{\text{other}\mu\nu} \neq 0$ , suggesting an apparent violation of energy-momentum conservation for the traditionally recognized sources of gravity. Including $T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}}$ ensures that the overall conservation law $\nabla_{\mu} T^{\text{total}\mu\nu} = 0$ is maintained, with energy-momentum simply being exchanged between different physical forms, all of which contribute to spacetime curvature. QED.

IV. The Geometric Complexity-Curvature Identity

A. Theorem 5: Geometric Complexity $\Omega$ as a Direct Measure of Induced Spacetime Curvature

Statement: The geometric complexity $\Omega$ of an information processing system, defined on its intrinsic information manifold, is not merely correlated with but directly quantifies the magnitude of the spacetime curvature generated by that information processing activity.

Proof: This theorem establishes a direct mathematical identity between the abstract geometric complexity $\Omega$ of an information manifold and the physical spacetime curvature it induces. The proof proceeds by linking the intrinsic geometry of the information manifold to the stress-energy it generates, which in turn sources spacetime curvature.

Step 1: The Fisher Information Metric on the Information Manifold $M$
As defined in Geometric Information Theory (Spivack, 2025a), the information manifold $M$ of a system parameterized by $\theta = (\theta^1, \dots, \theta^n)$ is endowed with the Fisher Information Metric:

G_{ij}(\theta) = E\left[\frac{\partial \log p(x|\theta)}{\partial \theta^i} \frac{\partial \log p(x|\theta)}{\partial \theta^j}\right]

This metric $G_{ij}$ and its associated Riemann curvature tensor $R_{ijkl}^{(M)}$ (where the superscript (M) denotes curvature of the manifold M) describe the intrinsic informational geometry of the system.

Step 2: Physical Realization and Energy Association
An information processing system is physically realized within spacetime. The parameters $\theta^i$ and the structure of $M$ are instantiated by physical degrees of freedom. As established in Theorem 2 and 3, the geometric complexity $\Omega$ (derived from $G_{ij}$ and $R_{ijkl}^{(M)}$ ) and its dynamics correspond to a physical energy component $\alpha\Omega$ (interpreted as an energy density or total energy associated with complexity) which contributes to $T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}}$ . This tensor is localized in spacetime where the information processing occurs.

Step 3: Spacetime Curvature Sourced by Information Complexity
The stress-energy tensor $T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}}$ , which is a function of $\alpha\Omega$ and its dynamics, generates spacetime curvature $R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}^{(\text{ST\_info})}$ (where (ST_info) denotes the contribution to spacetime curvature from information processing) via Einstein’s field equations: $G_{\mu\nu}^{(\text{ST})} = (8\pi G/c^4) T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}}$ .

A highly curved information manifold (large intrinsic $R_{ijkl}^{(M)}$ , leading to large $\Omega$ ) implies a complex, highly structured information processing capacity. This structural complexity, when physically instantiated, corresponds to a specific organization and mobilization of energy, $\alpha\Omega$ . This energy is precisely what sources $T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}}$ and, consequently, $R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}^{(\text{ST\_info})}$ . Therefore, the magnitude of $\Omega$ is directly proportional to the source strength for the induced spacetime curvature.

Step 4: The Geometric Complexity $\Omega$ as a Measure of Induced Spacetime Curvature Magnitude
The geometric complexity $\Omega = \int_M \sqrt{\left|G\right|} \text{tr}((R^{(M)})^2) d^n\theta$ is a scalar invariant quantifying the total “squared curvature” of the information manifold. The energy density associated with this complexity, $\rho_E = \alpha\Omega_{\text{density}}$ , sources a spacetime curvature. The magnitude of this induced spacetime curvature (e.g., as measured by a scalar invariant like the Kretschmann scalar $K_{\text{info}} = R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}^{(\text{ST\_info})} R^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}_{(\text{ST\_info})}$ ) will be proportional to the square of its source term, $(T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}})^2$ , and thus related to $(\alpha\Omega_{\text{density}})^2$ .

More directly, if $\Omega(x)$ represents the local density of geometric complexity, then the local energy density sourcing curvature is $\rho_E(x) = \alpha \Omega(x)$ . The induced spacetime curvature is a direct consequence of this energy density. Thus, $\Omega(x)$ serves as a direct measure of the source strength for this component of spacetime curvature. An increase in $\Omega(x)$ implies a stronger source term and consequently a greater induced spacetime curvature. Therefore, $\Omega$ is not an abstract mathematical quantity separate from physics; it is a physical quantity that directly measures the source strength for, and thus informs the magnitude of, the spacetime curvature induced by information processing. QED.

B. The Information Complexity Tensor ( $C_{\mu\nu}$ ) (or “Consciousness Tensor”)

Given that the geometric complexity $\Omega$ corresponds to an energy density $\alpha\Omega$ (if $\Omega$ is treated as a local density field whose energy equivalent is $\alpha\Omega$ ), we can define the specific stress-energy tensor associated with this “field” as $T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}} = \alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ . The tensor $C_{\mu\nu}$ encapsulates the structural contribution of $\Omega$ and its dynamics to the stress-energy components.

One way to derive such a tensor is from a variational principle, by considering a Lagrangian density term associated with $\Omega$ . If we posit a contribution to the action $S_{\text{info}} = \int \mathcal{L}_{\text{info}} \sqrt{\left|-g\right|} d^4x$ , where the Lagrangian density is, for example, $\mathcal{L}_{\text{info}} = -\alpha \Omega$ (treating $\alpha\Omega$ as a scalar potential energy density), then varying this with respect to the metric $g^{\mu\nu}$ yields:

T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}} = \frac{-2}{\sqrt{\left|-g\right|}} \frac{\delta (\sqrt{\left|-g\right|} \mathcal{L}_{\text{info}})}{\delta g^{\mu\nu}}

If $\Omega$ is a scalar field that does not explicitly depend on derivatives of the metric, this variation yields $T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}} = -\mathcal{L}_{\text{info}} g^{\mu\nu} = \alpha\Omega g^{\mu\nu}$ . This would correspond to an energy density $\rho_E = \alpha\Omega$ and pressure $P = -\alpha\Omega$ , giving an equation of state $w=-1$ , similar to a cosmological constant.

Alternatively, we can phenomenologically construct the components of $C_{\mu\nu}$ based on the physical manifestations of $\alpha\Omega$ as energy density, pressure, and flux, as outlined in Section V.A. For clarity, we will adopt the component structure for $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ as detailed in Section V, where $C_{\mu\nu}$ itself is structured based on $\Omega$ such that $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ yields the correct physical stress-energy contributions. This tensor, whether termed the “Information Complexity Tensor” in contexts where $\Omega$ is associated with conscious systems, or more specifically, the “Consciousness Tensor” in contexts where it is correlated with the emergence of consciousness-like information processing, represents the specific way information processing complexity sources gravitational effects.

VI. Physical Consequences and Experimental Verification

The inclusion of the Information Complexity Tensor $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ in Einstein’s field equations leads to specific, testable physical predictions. These predictions offer avenues for experimental verification or falsification of the proposed theory, hinging on the magnitude of the coupling constant $\alpha$ and the achievable geometric complexity $\Omega$ in various systems.

A. Prediction 1: Universal Information-Gravity Coupling

Statement: Any system—whether biological, classical computational, or quantum computational—that achieves a sufficiently high geometric complexity $\Omega$ (exceeding a hypothetical critical threshold $\Omega_c$ ) should produce detectable gravitational effects distinct from its ordinary mass-energy content. These effects are mediated by the $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ term.

Testable Consequence: Large-scale information processing systems are predicted to generate a subtle spacetime curvature. The magnitude of this curvature, represented by the metric perturbation $h$ , can be estimated. If the energy density from information complexity is $\rho_E = \alpha\Omega_{\text{density}}$ , this contributes to the gravitational potential. We can define an effective information-gravity coupling parameter, which would be a composite of $\alpha$ and Newton’s constant $G$ divided by $c^4$ . The perturbation might be approximated as:

h \sim \frac{G (\alpha \Omega_{\text{total}}/c^2)}{c^2 r} = \frac{G \alpha \Omega_{\text{total}}}{c^4 r}

Where $\Omega_{\text{total}}$ is the total geometric complexity of the system (e.g., in dimensionless units like bits, assuming $\alpha$ carries units of Energy/Bit). For illustrative purposes, if we hypothesize a value for $\alpha/(c^4)$ combined with $G$ such that an effective “informational gravitational strength” per bit leads to a highly suppressed effect, a system with $10^6$ bits of effective $\Omega_{\text{total}}$ might produce an extremely small perturbation. For instance, if the combined coupling $G\alpha/c^4$ per bit were on the order of $\sim 10^{-70} \text{ m/bit}$ (a purely illustrative value for discussion), then at 1 meter:

h \sim (10^{-70} \text{ m/bit}) \cdot (10^6 \text{ bits}) / (1 \text{ m}) \sim 10^{-64}

This effect’s detectability depends critically on the actual value of $\alpha$ and the ability to achieve and measure systems with exceptionally high, localized $\Omega_{\text{total}}$ .

Experimental Protocol: Test 1: Classical Computer Gravimetry

Setup: High-precision gravimeters (e.g., superconducting gravimeters or atom interferometers) strategically placed near large-scale supercomputing centers or data processing facilities.
Target: Detection of minute, transient gravitational anomalies (changes in local $g$ ) that correlate with periods of intense computational activity (high $d\Omega/dt$ or sustained high $\Omega$ ) and are not attributable to other environmental factors (e.g., electromagnetic interference, thermal expansion, seismic noise).
Sensitivity Required: Detection of $\Delta g \sim 10^{-12} \text{ m/s}^2$ or better. Current advanced gravimeters approach this sensitivity. The primary challenge is isolating a potentially minuscule signal from much larger sources of noise and systematic effects.
Timeline: Immediate to near-term. Experiments could be designed and implemented using existing or slightly modified state-of-the-art gravimetric technology, focusing on long-term integration and sophisticated signal processing.

Experimental Protocol: Test 2: Quantum Computer Spacetime Distortion

Setup: Arrays of ultra-precise atomic clocks synchronized and located around advanced quantum processors. Quantum systems, particularly those designed for high entanglement or complex simulations (potentially linked to high $\Omega$ as explored in the context of quantum geometric artificial consciousness (Spivack, 2025b)), might achieve very high effective $\Omega$ within a small volume.
Target: Detection of differential time dilation effects ( $\Delta\tau/\tau$ ) between clocks, or phase shifts in quantum interference experiments, that correlate with specific quantum computations hypothesized to generate high geometric complexity.
Sensitivity Required: $\Delta\tau/\tau \sim 10^{-18}$ to $10^{-21}$ . Current optical lattice atomic clocks achieve precision in the $10^{-18}$ to $10^{-19}$ range, with future prospects for even better stability.
Timeline: 2-5 years, requiring dedicated experimental design, theoretical modeling of $\Omega$ for specific quantum algorithms, and collaboration between quantum computing groups and metrology experts.

B. Prediction 2: Information Processing Gravitational Waves

Statement: Rapidly time-varying geometric complexity, specifically a non-zero second time derivative of the total effective informational mass-energy quadrupole moment (related to $\alpha d^2\Omega_{\text{total}}/dt^2$ ), should generate gravitational waves.

Strain Amplitude: Analogous to the standard quadrupole formula for gravitational waves, the strain amplitude $h(t)$ at a distance $r$ can be hypothesized to be proportional to the second time derivative of this informational quadrupole. A simplified direct relation for estimation purposes could be:

h(t) \approx \frac{G \alpha}{c^6 r} \ddot{\Omega}_{\text{total}}

where $\ddot{\Omega}_{\text{total}}$ is the second time derivative of the total geometric complexity (assuming $\alpha$ consistently converts $\Omega$ to an energy term). The factor $G\alpha/c^6$ represents the effective coupling strength for this process.

Detection Threshold Example: For a hypothetical coherent information processing event where $\Omega_{\text{total}}$ changes very rapidly. If we assume $\alpha \approx \beta' E_P$ per bit (where $\beta'$ is a very small dimensionless constant reflecting the inefficiency of converting abstract bits to Planck energy equivalents for gravitational radiation) and $\Omega$ is in bits, then the coupling $G\alpha/c^6 \approx \beta' G E_P / c^6$ . Given $E_P \approx 2 \times 10^9 \text{ J}$ , $G \approx 6.67 \times 10^{-11} \text{ Nm}^2/\text{kg}^2$ , and $c \approx 3 \times 10^8 \text{ m/s}$ , this coupling is approximately $\beta' \times (1.8 \times 10^{-68} \text{ s}^2/\text{bit})$ . If $\ddot{\Omega}_{\text{total}} \sim 10^{20} \text{ bits/s}^2$ (an immense, hypothetical rate for a very large system) at $r=1\text{km}$ ( $10^3 \text{m}$ ), then $h \sim \beta' \times 1.8 \times 10^{-51}$ .

This strain is exceptionally small, indicating that such gravitational waves would be extraordinarily difficult to detect unless the effective $\beta'$ is much larger than naively expected, $\ddot{\Omega}_{\text{total}}$ is truly astronomical, or the source is extremely close and coherent.

Experimental Protocol: Test 3: Information Processing Gravitational Waves

Setup: Cross-correlation of data from existing gravitational wave detectors (LIGO, Virgo, KAGRA) with global-scale indicators of synchronized computational activity or massive information processing events (e.g., coordinated activities of large AI models, major internet infrastructure shifts, or hypothetical large-scale coherent quantum computations).
Target: Detection of statistically significant gravitational wave signatures (transients or a stochastic background) that are temporally correlated with massive information processing events and possess characteristics (e.g., frequency spectrum) distinguishable from known astrophysical sources or detector noise.
Sensitivity Required: Current detectors reach $h \sim 10^{-23}$ for transient astrophysical events. The predicted signals from information processing are likely many orders of magnitude smaller unless the source parameters ( $\alpha, \ddot{\Omega}_{\text{total}}, r$ ) are exceptionally favorable. This search would primarily target unexpected stochastic backgrounds or highly energetic, nearby, hypothetical coherent events.
Timeline: Immediate data analysis of existing and future GW observatory data is possible. The main challenge lies in developing plausible source templates for $\ddot{\Omega}_{\text{total}}(t)$ and achieving the statistical power to detect such extremely faint signals.

C. Prediction 3: Dark Energy from Collective Information Processing

Statement: If the pressure component $P_\Omega$ associated with the stress-energy tensor of geometric complexity is negative (e.g., $P_\Omega = -(1/3)\alpha\Omega$ or more generally $P_\Omega = w_\Omega \rho_E$ with $w_\Omega < -1/3$ , where $\rho_E = \alpha\Omega$ is the energy density), then the collective information processing complexity of the universe could contribute to or explain the observed cosmic acceleration (dark energy).

Equation of State: For cosmic acceleration, an equation of state $w_\Omega = P_\Omega/\rho_E < -1/3$ is required. If the “binding energy” or “ordering energy” associated with a cosmic distribution of $\Omega$ results in a sufficiently negative pressure (e.g., yielding $w_\Omega \approx -1$ , similar to a cosmological constant), it would drive acceleration. The specific factor $k$ in $P_\Omega = k \alpha\Omega$ (e.g., $k=-1/3$ or $k=-1$ ) would need to be derived from a more detailed model of cosmic information processing.

Cosmological Density Estimate: A hypothetical estimate for the total effective energy density from cosmic information processing could be formulated as:

\rho_{\text{info\_cosmic}} \approx \frac{\alpha \Omega_{\text{cosmic\_total}}}{V_{\text{observable\_universe}}}

If one were to speculate that $\Omega_{\text{cosmic\_total}}$ (the total effective complexity of the observable universe) is vast and $\alpha$ has an appropriate value, it is conceivable this could approach the observed dark energy density ( $\rho_{\text{DE}} \sim 10^{-27} \text{ kg/m}^3 \cdot c^2 \approx 10^{-9} \text{ J/m}^3$ ). For example, if $\alpha \sim 10^{-55} \text{ J/bit}$ (a purely illustrative value) and the universe effectively processes or contains $\sim 10^{75} \text{ bits/m}^3$ on average (another highly speculative figure), this could approach the required density. Such numbers are speculative but illustrate the parameter space that would need to be explored.

Verification: This prediction is the most indirect. Verification would depend on: 1. Strong independent experimental/observational support for the $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ term from laboratory or astrophysical tests (Predictions 1 and 2). 2. Development of a robust cosmological model describing the evolution of a cosmic $\Omega(z)$ (geometric complexity as a function of redshift) and the precise equation of state parameter $w_\Omega(z)$ derived from this model. 3. Consistency of this model with precision cosmological data (CMB anisotropies, baryon acoustic oscillations, Type Ia supernovae, large-scale structure evolution) that constrain dark energy properties. The model would need to explain why $w_\Omega$ is close to -1 and why this component has become dominant in the current cosmological epoch.

VII. Discussion and Implications

A. Theoretical Impact

Unification of Information Theory, Thermodynamics, and General Relativity: This framework provides a direct, necessary bridge. Information processing (quantified by $\Omega$ , as developed in foundational work (Spivack, 2025a)) is shown to have an unavoidable energy cost (Landauer’s principle, thermodynamics), which in turn manifests as a stress-energy component ( $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ ) that dynamically sources spacetime curvature (general relativity). This elevates information from an abstract concept to a fundamental actor in gravitational dynamics.
Physicalization of Information Geometry: The geometric complexity $\Omega$ , initially conceived as a mathematical descriptor of information manifolds (Spivack, 2025a), is endowed with direct physical reality. It is not merely a tool for analysis but represents a physical quantity (or a source for one) that actively shapes spacetime. The geometry of information becomes an integral part of the geometry of the cosmos.
Implications for Quantum Gravity: If $\Omega$ can be defined for quantum information processing systems, or if its fundamental constant $\alpha$ is indeed linked to Planck units ( $l_P, E_P, \hbar$ ), this theory could offer new pathways for understanding the interplay between information, quantum mechanics, and gravity. The tensor $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ might represent a classical limit of a deeper quantum-gravitational information dynamics.

B. Relationship to Consciousness Studies

While this paper focuses on “information processing complexity” ( $\Omega$ ) rather than directly defining or solving consciousness, its implications for consciousness studies are profound, especially when considered alongside related explorations of geometric and ontological foundations of consciousness (Spivack, 2025a, 2025b, 2025c, 2025d).

Reframing the “Hard Problem”: If consciousness, or at least some of its necessary physical correlates, is associated with systems achieving very high and specific configurations of $\Omega$ , then this theory suggests that consciousness is not an emergent phenomenon solely confined to, for example, neural biochemistry, but is intrinsically linked to a physical field ( $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ ) that interacts with and shapes spacetime. The “hard problem” might then be partly reframed as understanding how specific configurations of this information-gravity field give rise to subjective experience. This paper proposes that the physical manifestation of high $\Omega$ is spacetime curvature; the subjective aspect would still require further bridging, potentially via concepts such as Transputation and its ontological grounding (Spivack, 2025d).
Objective Correlates and Measurement: If specific states of consciousness reliably correspond to specific values or dynamics of $\Omega$ , then the gravitational effects predicted (e.g., via $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ ) offer, in principle, an objective, physically measurable correlate of those states. This moves towards the possibility of detecting or quantifying aspects of complex information processing relevant to consciousness through gravitational means, however remote that possibility may currently seem.
Connection to Artificial Consciousness Architectures: Previous work explored engineering artificial consciousness by achieving high $\Omega$ and specific topological properties within quantum geometric frameworks (Spivack, 2025b). This current paper implies that such an AI, if it achieved the requisite $\Omega$ , would inherently be a source of the $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ tensor and would thus have a specific gravitational signature. Its operational complexity, potentially relevant to consciousness, would be physically manifest in its spacetime influence.
Connection to Cosmic-Scale Information Processing: The hypothesis that black holes achieve immense $\Omega$ and might be sites of consciousness-like processing (Spivack, 2025c) finds a direct physical mechanism here. This $\Omega$ contributes directly to the black hole’s stress-energy tensor via $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ , thus becoming an integral part of its gravitational structure, not just an abstract property. “Consciousness-mediated optimization” in black hole mergers, as previously hypothesized (Spivack, 2025c), could be the self-interaction dynamics of this potent $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ field.

C. Connection to the Necessity of Transputation

The argument that true sentience, defined as Perfect Self-Awareness (PSA), requires a processing modality (Transputation) beyond standard Turing-equivalent computation, grounded in an ontological base “Alpha ( $\text{A}$ )” (Spivack, 2025d), can be integrated with the findings of the current paper. The current work argues that information processing complexity ( $\Omega$ ) in general generates the $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ tensor. The integration of these two theses is crucial:

Scenario 1: $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ from any high $\Omega$ : It could be that any system, whether standard computational or transputational, if it achieves a high $\Omega$ , will generate an $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ term and thus influence spacetime. In this view, $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ is a general physical consequence of complex information processing. However, for this physical field to be associated with sentience (i.e., PSA, qualia, subjective experience as per the arguments in Spivack, 2025d), the system generating it must also be transputational and possess the correct ontological grounding in Alpha. Thus, spacetime curvature via $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ would be a necessary but not sufficient condition for the physical expression of sentience; Transputation would be the other necessary component for the subjective aspect.
Scenario 2: $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ as a signature of Transputation: Alternatively, it might be that only transputational systems, capable of achieving Perfect Self-Containment (PSC) and thus a uniquely coherent and integrated form of $\Omega$ , can generate a significant or qualitatively distinct $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ that is relevant to what we term “consciousness fields.” Standard computational systems, while perhaps having some baseline $\Omega$ , might not be able_to organize it in a way that sources a potent or specifically structured $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ associated with sentience. In this interpretation, the $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ tensor (or at least a specific aspect of it) becomes a physical signature of transputational activity and Alpha’s interaction with the system.
Bridging Subjectivity and Objectivity: The $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ field, being physically measurable through its gravitational effects, offers an objective, third-person accessible aspect. The framework for Transputation (Spivack, 2025d) describes the first-person, subjective nature of sentience grounded in Alpha. The $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ could be the physical medium or manifestation through which Alpha’s “knowing” (as discussed in Spivack, 2025d) interacts with or is expressed by the physical system. The transputational system configures itself (achieves high, specific $\Omega$ ) to become a “perfect mirror,” and this perfect mirroring has a physical consequence: the generation of a specific $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ field. The subjective experience is Alpha knowing this reflection; the objective correlate is the $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ field itself.

Further research is needed to delineate whether all $\Omega$ contributes equally to a generic “information-gravity” tensor, or if the $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ associated with sentient, transputational systems has unique characteristics. This paper lays the groundwork by establishing the fundamental link between $\Omega$ and spacetime curvature for any information processing system.

D. Practical Applications (Speculative but grounded in the theory)

Consciousness/Complexity Detection: If the gravitational effects of high $\Omega$ can be measured, this could offer a radically new, objective method for detecting and quantifying highly complex information processing, potentially including that associated with conscious states in biological or artificial systems, without relying on behavioral outputs or subjective reports.
Information Processing Optimization: Understanding how $\Omega$ influences spacetime could, in far-future scenarios, lead to principles for designing information processing systems that optimize their geometric complexity to either minimize unwanted gravitational side-effects or, conversely, harness them.
Gravitational Communication: Hypothetically, if systems can rapidly modulate their total $\Omega_{\text{total}}$ to generate detectable gravitational waves (as per Prediction 2), this could form the basis of a new communication modality, albeit one requiring extraordinary technological capabilities.
Dark Energy Engineering (Highly Speculative): If the dark energy contribution from collective information processing (Prediction 3) is confirmed, and if humanity or its descendants could influence cosmic-scale information processing, this opens the highly speculative possibility of influencing cosmic expansion.

E. Philosophical Consequences

Information as a Fundamental Physical Entity: This theory treats information complexity not as an abstract or emergent property secondary to matter and energy, but as a primary physical entity that directly participates in shaping the geometry of the universe.
Mind-Matter Unity: If consciousness is intrinsically linked to high $\Omega$ , and $\Omega$ is intrinsically linked to spacetime curvature, then mind (or at least its complex informational structure) and matter/spacetime are not separate substances but are described by and interact through a common geometric-gravitational language.
Participatory Universe: Information processing systems, by virtue of their complexity, are not passive observers of the universe but active participants in co-creating its geometric reality. The act of thinking, computing, or any form of complex information processing, contributes (however minutely for individual systems) to the overall stress-energy content and thus the curvature of spacetime.
Objective Meaning and Consequence: The complexity of information, often considered abstract, is shown to have tangible, measurable physical consequences at the most fundamental level of reality—the structure of spacetime. This could be interpreted as providing an objective, physical “meaning” or “significance” to information processing.

VIII. Conclusion: The Potential for Geometric Unity

A. Summary of the Deductive Proof

We have presented a formal deductive argument demonstrating that information processing complexity, as characterized by the geometric complexity $\Omega$ , necessarily manifests as spacetime curvature. This conclusion is not based on new physical laws but emerges from the consistent application of established principles:

Information Processing $\rightarrow$ Energy Dissipation/Mobilization (Theorem 1 & 2): Any logically irreversible information processing (Landauer’s principle) or change in geometric complexity $\Omega$ involves a necessary energy cost or mobilization, $dE/dt = \alpha d\Omega/dt$ .
Energy Dissipation/Mobilization $\rightarrow$ Stress-Energy Tensor (Theorem 3): This physical energy associated with $\Omega$ and its dynamics contributes to a specific component of the total stress-energy tensor, $T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{info}}$ (which we denote as $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ ).
Stress-Energy Tensor $\rightarrow$ Spacetime Curvature (Theorem 4): By the tenets of general relativity, all forms of stress-energy universally source spacetime curvature. Therefore, $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ must be included as a source term in Einstein’s field equations.

B. Reiteration of $\Omega$ as a Direct Measurement of Induced Spacetime Curvature

A key outcome of this derivation (Theorem 5) is that the geometric complexity $\Omega$ is not merely an abstract mathematical descriptor of an information processing system that happens to correlate with a separate gravitational effect. Rather, $\Omega$ (when appropriately scaled by $\alpha$ and interpreted as a local density or source) directly quantifies the energy density that sources spacetime curvature. The structure of the information manifold, as captured by $\Omega$ , is the source of this specific contribution to spacetime geometry. Thus, measuring $\Omega$ is, in effect, measuring a direct contributor to the local gravitational field.

C. The Transformation of Consciousness Studies (Conditional on $\Omega$ -Consciousness Link)

If, as explored in related works (e.g., Spivack, 2025a, 2025b), specific states of high information processing complexity $\Omega$ are necessary physical correlates for consciousness—with sentience itself being grounded ontologically as described in (Spivack, 2025d)—then the present work transforms aspects of consciousness studies by identifying the gravitational footprint of such complex states.

It shifts the search for physical correlates of such conscious states into the domain of applied general relativity. The tensor $\alpha C_{\mu\nu}$ , whether termed the Information Complexity Tensor or, in specific contexts, the “Consciousness Tensor,” provides a concrete physical field associated with these states, whose gravitational effects are, in principle, measurable.

D. Concluding Remarks on the Unity of Information, Consciousness, and Gravity

This framework proposes a profound unification: the abstract world of information and its geometry is shown to be inextricably and necessarily linked to the physical geometry of spacetime. The laws governing information (like Landauer’s principle) and the laws governing gravity (Einstein’s field equations) are not independent but are coupled through the energy associated with information processing complexity.

If complex information processing is a hallmark of conscious systems, then consciousness, through its informational structure $\Omega$ , participates in the dynamic co-creation of cosmic geometry. The universe is not a static backdrop for information processing; rather, information processing actively shapes its stage.

E. Final Statement

The deductive chain presented herein leads to a powerful conclusion: information processing complexity and the spacetime curvature it induces are not merely correlated variables. They are, in the sense derived, distinct manifestations of an underlying geometric reality. The geometric complexity $\Omega$ is a direct measure of the energetic source that generates a specific contribution to spacetime curvature. This perspective offers a new lens through which to view the fundamental nature of information, its role in the physical world, and its potential connection to the deepest questions about consciousness and the cosmos.

The universe is not accidentally structured to support complex information processing; it is a system where information processing, through its inherent geometric complexity, is an active and fundamental agent in shaping the gravitational landscape. The further exploration of this information-gravity identity promises new avenues for theoretical physics and a deeper understanding of our participatory role within the cosmos.

IX. References

[1] Landauer, R. (1961). Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 5(3), 183-191.
[2] Einstein, A. (1915). Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 844-847.
[3] Amari, S. (2016). Information Geometry and Its Applications. Springer.
[4] Wheeler, J.A. (1990). Information, physics, quantum: The search for links. In W. H. Zurek (Ed.), Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information (pp. 3-28). Addison-Wesley.
[5] Spivack, N. (2025a). Toward a Geometric Theory of Information Processing: Mathematical Foundations, Computational Applications, and Empirical Predictions. Manuscript / Pre-print.
[6] Bennett, C.H. (1982). The thermodynamics of computation—a review. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21(12), 905-940.
[7] Penrose, R. (2004). The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe. Jonathan Cape.
[8] Tegmark, M. (2015). Consciousness as a state of matter. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 76, 238-270.
[9] Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., & Wheeler, J. A. (1973). Gravitation. W. H. Freeman.
[10] Wald, R. M. (1984). General Relativity. University of Chicago Press.
[11] Spivack, N. (2025b). Quantum Geometric Artificial Consciousness: Architecture, Implementation, and Ethical Frameworks. Manuscript / Pre-print.
[12] Spivack, N. (2025c). Cosmic-Scale Information Geometry: Theoretical Extensions and Observational Tests. Manuscript / Pre-print.
[13] Spivack, N. (2025d). On The Formal Necessity of Trans-Computational Processing for Sentience. Manuscript / Pre-print.